- two clearly stated decisions depend on one another
- up to three jurisdictions must be assessed together
- combinations and sequence matter more than isolated product selection
- one memorandum should record the options, exclusions, and priorities
SEQUENCE DECISIONS
Two decisions. One sequence that makes both work.
We assess both decisions together and establish which must come first so the second remains viable.
02 / 04DECISION SCOPE → ENGAGEMENT
- 01Confirm or reject one route
- 02Sequence two decisions
- 03Design several domains as one system
- 04Implement an approved plan
FEEUSD 8,700
DECISION SCOPEUp to two connected decisions
BOUNDARYUp to three jurisdictions · indicative project effort: 12–15 hours
WRITTEN RESULT15–20-page memorandum with options, exclusions, and priorities
AFTER THIS ENGAGEMENT
You know which combination works—and what must be decided first.
- 01identify viable combinations
- 02set the right sequence
- 03eliminate dead ends and duplicated work
THE DEPENDENCY
If the first answer changes the second, separate reviews are not enough.
We assess both decisions within one framework and show which conditions open, change, or close the next route.
- one clearly defined question is sufficient
- three or more decision domains already require an overall architecture
- only implementation of an approved plan is needed
- you expect No Borders Founder to provide legal or tax advice
DECISION MAP
One decision map makes both decisions and their dependencies visible.
The map shows viable combinations, conflicts, sequence, and stop points.- 01Decision A
- 02Interaction
- 03Decision B
- 04Recommended sequence
THE WORK NO BORDERS FOUNDER TAKES OFF YOUR DESK
Two questions. One coherent decision path.
We bring the facts, dependencies, and viable combinations into one working record. You see which condition must be met first, which combinations remain viable, and where an early stop prevents duplicated work.
01 / 04
Two connected decisions
We define both questions and show where the answer to the first changes the options for the second.
WHAT YOU RECEIVE
One memorandum capturing the viable combination, exclusions, and sequence.
You see which combination is viable, which variants should be excluded, and in what sequence the two decisions should be made.
Decision Memorandum
15–20 pages covering facts, options, tradeoffs, and a reasoned recommendation.
Combination Map
Visual logic for viable and nonviable combinations between the two decisions.
Risk & Exclusion Register
Risks, exclusions, assumptions, and outstanding professional reviews in one view.
Priority Sequence
Recommended order with approvals, responsibilities, and next work packages.
HOW THE ENGAGEMENT WORKS
Examine two questions. Establish one defensible sequence.
- 01
Connect the decisions
We define both questions, the jurisdictions involved, and the dependencies to be tested.
- 02
Create one shared record
Personal, business, and financial facts are consolidated into one consistent working record.
- 03
Compare variants
We assess relevant combinations and document utility, requirements, implications, and exclusions.
- 04
Deliver a prioritized recommendation
You receive the memorandum, recommended sequence, and a personal findings discussion.
SCOPE BOUNDARIES
Two decisions in scope. Specialist opinions separate.
- up to two clearly defined, connected decisions
- up to three relevant jurisdictions
- integrated analysis of decision-relevant dependencies
- written memorandum with recommendation and exclusions
- one findings review meeting
- a complete architecture spanning more than two decisions
- legal, tax, or other regulated professional opinions
- applications, formations, onboarding, or ongoing provider coordination
- government, bank, provider, and other third-party fees
- outcome or approval guarantees
FEE LOGIC
Two decisions are assessed within one integrated engagement.
The USD 8,700 fee covers up to two connected decisions, up to three jurisdictions, and an indicative project effort of 12–15 working hours. Any expansion is defined in writing before additional work begins.
External professional services and third-party costs are itemized separately. The individual engagement agreement takes precedence.READINESS AND HANDOFF
What we need to assess both decisions together.
- specific objectives for both decisions
- complete personal and business circumstances
- relevant ownership, banking, and wealth information
- existing structures, proposals, and professional opinions
QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS ENGAGEMENT
What to know about viable combinations and sequence.
01Why not use two separate reviews?+
When one answer changes the other, separate reviews can miss the interaction and sequence. The memorandum keeps both decisions within one consistent working record.
02What if one of the two routes does not hold up?+
A reasoned exclusion is still a useful outcome. The memorandum records which condition is not met, what that means for the second decision, and whether another sequence or combination remains viable within the agreed scope.
03What happens if a third decision emerges?+
We pause the expansion and assess whether a Cross-Border Decision Blueprint is required. Additional scope does not begin without written approval.
04Can my existing advisers be involved?+
Yes. Existing professional opinions can form part of the shared working record, and open questions can be directed to the relevant specialists. They remain responsible for their own advice. Additional professional work is not included in the fee.
05Are external professional reviews included?+
No. Legal, tax, investment, and other regulated professional work requires separate engagement and payment.
OTHER ENGAGEMENTS