Strategic Decision Review
- Decision load
- one decision
- Jurisdictions
- up to 2
- Indicative effort
- 8–10 hrs.
- Written result
- 8–12-page Decision Note
- Implementation
- not included
- Fee
- USD 5,800
NO BORDERS FOUNDER / DECISION OFFICE
ENGAGEMENTS & FEES
Four engagements. The right scope for your decision.
Not every international question requires a complete architecture. Every engagement does require a clear scope, a written deliverable, and clear lines of responsibility. We select the engagement according to the number and interdependence of the decisions—not the highest fee.
01—04DECISION LOAD → ENGAGEMENT
- 01One decision
- 02Two decisions
- 03Multiple domains
- 04Approved plan
SELECTION LOGIC
Scope is derived from the decision.
One question, two connected decisions, and an overall architecture require different scopes. The engagement ladder makes that distinction visible before you engage us.
01One decision
Strategic Decision Review
One bounded question needs a defensible answer before you commit time or capital.
USD 5,8008–12-page Decision Note with recommendation, risks, and next steps
View engagement details ↗02Two decisions
Extended Strategic Decision Review
Two questions affect one another and require a single integrated recommendation.
USD 8,70015–20-page memorandum with options, exclusions, and priorities
View engagement details ↗03Multiple domains
Cross-Border Decision Blueprint
Jurisdictions, structures, and participants must work as one architecture.
USD 17,40025–40-page blueprint covering decision and implementation architecture
View engagement details ↗04Approved plan
Coordinated Implementation
An approved architecture is ready to be implemented with clear accountability.
Quoted separatelyCoordinated implementation plan with clear responsibilities
View engagement details ↗DIRECT COMPARISON
Four paths. Six distinctions established before work begins.
The table can be scrolled horizontally.
| Criterion | 01Strategic Decision Review | 02Extended Strategic Decision Review | 03Cross-Border Decision Blueprint | 04Coordinated Implementation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision load | one decision | two connected decisions | up to three domains | approved plan |
| Jurisdictions | up to 2 | up to 3 | up to 4 | scope-specific |
| Indicative effort | 8–10 hrs. | 12–15 hrs. | 24–30 hrs. | defined by implementation scope |
| Written result | 8–12-page Decision Note | 15–20-page memorandum | 25–40-page Blueprint | plan + responsibility matrix |
| Implementation | not included | not included | not included | separate engagement |
| Fee | USD 5,800 | USD 8,700 | USD 17,400 | Quoted separately |
Extended Strategic Decision Review
- Decision load
- two connected decisions
- Jurisdictions
- up to 3
- Indicative effort
- 12–15 hrs.
- Written result
- 15–20-page memorandum
- Implementation
- not included
- Fee
- USD 8,700
Cross-Border Decision Blueprint
- Decision load
- up to three domains
- Jurisdictions
- up to 4
- Indicative effort
- 24–30 hrs.
- Written result
- 25–40-page Blueprint
- Implementation
- not included
- Fee
- USD 17,400
Coordinated Implementation
- Decision load
- approved plan
- Jurisdictions
- scope-specific
- Indicative effort
- defined by implementation scope
- Written result
- plan + responsibility matrix
- Implementation
- separate engagement
- Fee
- Quoted separately
THE WRITTEN RESULT
Clarity becomes a written decision record.
Each level concludes with a different written result. The client, No Borders Founder, and external professionals can therefore work from the same documented fact base.
8–12-page Decision Note
At the end, you know which route we recommend, which alternative remains realistic, which requirements are still unmet, and what can be commissioned next.
15–20-page memorandum
You see which combination is viable, which variants should be excluded, and in what sequence the two decisions should be made.
25–40-page blueprint covering decision and implementation architecture
You see the target structure as one connected system: what remains, what changes, which route is prioritized, which professional review is still required, and how implementation can be controlled.
Coordinated implementation plan
You retain a decision center: one shared fact pattern, clear responsibilities, documented approvals, and transparent visibility over progress, blockers, and next steps.
FEES AND ACCOUNTABILITY
Govern connected work. Keep professional roles separate.
Decision architecture
We structure the overall question, consolidate the fact pattern, document the tradeoffs, and coordinate the agreed interfaces.
Independent professional accountability
Lawyers, tax advisors, banks, and other regulated specialists remain responsible for their own advice and decisions. Their services are commissioned separately.
Visible before commitment
Government charges, bank fees, provider services, transaction costs, and other external costs are itemized where material. Any potential third-party compensation is disclosed.
Published engagement fees are stated before applicable taxes. The binding engagement agreement—not this overview—defines the individual scope. No engagement or coordination assignment guarantees approval, account opening, a tax outcome, product performance, or processing time.
FROM INQUIRY TO RESULT
The relationship begins with a clear scope.
- 01
Engagement fit
The decision, participants, jurisdictions, and intended result are assessed without collecting unnecessary sensitive data.
- 02
Written scope
The engagement, boundaries, deliverable, fee, external costs, and roles are agreed before work begins.
- 03
Shared fact base
Facts, documents, assumptions, and outstanding professional reviews are maintained in one consistent working record.
- 04
Decision and handoff
You receive the agreed document, a findings review, and a clearly scoped next step.
QUESTIONS BEFORE ENGAGING US
What to know before an engagement.
01How is the appropriate engagement selected?+
The choice depends on the number and interdependence of decisions, material jurisdictions, required written output, and implementation readiness. We recommend the smallest scope capable of producing a defensible decision.
02Are implementation and external professional advice included in the fee?+
No. Legal, tax, investment, and other regulated professional work, provider services, government charges, bank fees, and implementation are commissioned and itemized separately.
03Can Coordinated Implementation begin without a prior review?+
Only when a defensible, approved architecture already exists. Otherwise, there is no reliable basis for work packages, accountability, or approval points.
04What happens if the scope expands during the engagement?+
Additional work does not begin automatically. New questions, jurisdictions, or dependencies are identified and scoped and quoted in writing before work continues.
05Are all engagement inquiries accepted?+
No. The engagement-fit review considers suitability, role, potential conflicts, the available fact base, and an appropriate initial engagement scope. It does not mean that No Borders Founder will accept the engagement.
NEXT STEP
Not the largest engagement. The right engagement.
The engagement-fit review assesses role, complexity, and an appropriate initial engagement scope. It is not free individual advice and does not mean that No Borders Founder will accept the engagement.
Assess engagement fit